« Return to search form
Please note that data are cataloged by fiscal years. For more info see our user guide.
Change year to:
District of Columbia Revenue Lost to Tax Abatement Programs
| Total Revenue Lost: | $69,718,000
|
Download results as
CSV
or
XML
State-level programs
Click on the name of a program for more details.
| Year | Program Name | Program Type  | Gross Revenue Loss |
| 2019 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Possessory Interest Tax | Construction/rehabilitation | $1,008,000 |
| 2019 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Real Property Tax | Construction/rehabilitation | $11,327,000 |
| 2020 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Possessory Interest Tax | Construction/rehabilitation | $2,015,000 |
| 2021 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Possessory Interest Tax | Construction/rehabilitation | $2,029,000 |
| 2022 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Possessory Interest Tax | Construction/rehabilitation | $1,999,000 |
| 2016 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Possessory Interest Tax | General Economic Development | $725,000 |
| 2016 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Real Property Tax | General Economic Development | $6,891,000 |
| 2017 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Possessory Interest Tax | General Economic Development | $158,000 |
| 2017 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Real Property Tax | General Economic Development | $6,575,000 |
| 2018 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Real Property Tax | General Economic Development | $9,159,000 |
| 2020 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Real Property Tax | Property improvements | $9,903,000 |
| 2021 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Real Property Tax | Property improvements | $8,661,000 |
| 2022 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Real Property Tax | Property improvements | $8,284,000 |
| 2018 | Special Tax Incentive Program - Possessory Interest Tax | Real estate development | $984,000 |
| TABULATED STATE-LEVEL TOTAL | | $69,718,000 |
Tabulated localities and districts
Click on the name of jurisdiction for a list of tax abatement programs that reduced its tax revenue.
Data includes abatement information for the five most populous cities, counties, and school districts in each state (where available). If no data is shown for these top five jurisdictions, it is because they did not disclose GASB 77 tax abatement information in the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), the amount reported was $0, or the ACFR has not been published yet. Some states include data for additional years and jurisdictions.
