Please note that data are cataloged by fiscal years -- you can switch to different years using the links below. For more info see our user guide.
Minnesota 2019 Revenue Lost to Tax Abatement Programs
Population in 2019 : not available
Concerned about the low disclosure? We have created institutional schematics for GASB-77 implementation in 50 states and DC. Learn who's in charge of compliance in our ROADMAP PROJECT. You can also get a CSV file of noncomplying jurisdictions in the state.
Click on the name of a program for more details.
|Program Name||Program Type||Revenue Loss|
|Angel Tax Credit Program||Capital investment||$6,470,000|
|Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Facility Program||Biopharmaceuticals||not reported|
|Border City Enterprise Zones Program||Economic development (EZ)||$312,000|
|Greater MN Job Expansion Program||Job creation||not reported|
|Historic Structure Rehabilitation Credit Program||Historic preservation||not reported|
|Job Opportunity Building Zones Program||Job creation||not reported|
|TABULATED STATE-LEVEL TOTAL||$6,782,000|
Tabulated localities and districts
Click on the name of jurisdiction for a list of tax abatement programs that reduced its tax revenue.
Local government reporting rate
We estimated the reporting rate among local governments for each state using 2018 data. This is to gauge how much data is available in that state.
For Minnesota, the estimated reporting rate is as follows:
Cities/counties: 64 out of 114 CAFRs or financial statements we examined provided information on tax abatement programs in accordance with GASB Statement No.77.
School districts: 19 out of 132 CAFRs or financial statements we examined provided information on tax abatement programs in accordance with GASB Statement No.77.