Please note that data are cataloged by fiscal years -- you can switch to different years using the links below. For more info see our user guide.
Missouri 2016 Revenue Lost to Tax Abatement Programs
Population in 2016 : 12,210
Concerned about the lack of disclosure? We have created institutional schematics for the implementation of GASB Statement No. 77 on Tax Abatement Disclosures in the 50 states and DC: Learn who's in charge of compliance in our ROADMAP PROJECT. You can also get a CSV file of the localities in MO that did not make any tax abatement disclosures in their annual financial reports.
Click on the name of a program for more details.
Tabulated localities and districts
Click on the name of jurisdiction for a list of tax abatement programs that reduced its tax revenue.
|Reporting Jurisdiction||Jurisdiction Type||Gross Revenue Loss|
|Cape Girardeau County||County||$1,320,072|
|New Madrid County||County||$638,657|
|St. Charles County||County||$281,713|
|St. Francois County||County||$723,000|
|St. Louis County||County||$1,346,263|
|Washington Schools||School district||$165,384|
|Kansas City Public Library||Special district||$2,680,802|
|TABULATED LOCALITY AND DISTRICT TOTAL||$36,272,828|
Local government reporting rate
We estimated the reporting rate among local governments for each state using 2018 and 2019 data. This is to gauge how much data is available in that state.
For Missouri, the estimated reporting rate is as follows:
Cities/counties: 34 out of 68 CAFRs or financial statements we examined provided information on tax abatement programs in accordance with GASB Statement No.77.
School districts: 97 out of 206 CAFRs or financial statements we examined provided information on tax abatement programs in accordance with GASB Statement No.77.