Please note that data are cataloged by fiscal years -- you can switch to different years using the links below. For more info see our user guide.
Missouri 2018 Revenue Lost to Tax Abatement Programs
Click on the name of a program for more details.
|Program Name||Program Type||Revenue Loss|
|Missouri Low Income Housing Tax Credit||Affordable housing||$169,139,000|
|Chapter 100 Personal Property Tax Exemption||Business incentive||$268,000|
|Rebuilding Communities Tax Credit||Community development||$359,000|
|Neighborhood Preservation Tax Credit||Construction/rehabilitation||$3,293,000|
|Enhanced Enterprise Zone (EZ)||Economic development (EZ)||$5,569,000|
|Historic Preservation Tax Credit||Historic preservation||$56,483,000|
|Business Use Incentives for Large-Scale Development||Infrastructure||$9,818,000|
|Development Tax Credit||Job creation/retention||$542,000|
|Missouri Quality Jobs||Job creation/retention||$68,229,000|
|Missouri Works - Business Incentives||Job creation/retention||$56,399,000|
|Business Facility Tax Credit||Job creation/retention; capital investment||$6,330,000|
|Missouri Manufacturing Jobs Act||Manufacturing||$15,638,000|
|Distressed Areas Land Assemblage||Redevelopment/revitalization/renewal||$68,000|
|Amateur Sports Ticket Sales Tax Credit||Sporting event bidding||$1,276,000|
|Data Center Sales Tax Exemption||Technology (DC)||not reported|
|Missouri Works Job Retention Training||Workforce development||$3,521,000|
|Missouri Works New Jobs Training||Workforce development||$5,600,000|
|TABULATED STATE-LEVEL TOTAL||$405,692,000|
Tabulated localities and districts
Click on the name of jurisdiction for a list of tax abatement programs that reduced its tax revenue.
We estimated the reporting rate among local governments for each state using 2018 and 2019 data. This is to gauge how much data is available in that state.
For Missouri, the estimated reporting rate is as follows:
Cities/counties: 34 out of 68 CAFRs or financial statements we examined provided information on tax abatement programs in accordance with GASB Statement No.77.
School districts: 135 out of 405 CAFRs or financial statements we examined provided information on tax abatement programs in accordance with GASB Statement No.77.
Concerned about the lack of disclosure? Check out the roadmap on GASB 77 compliance we created for MO. You can also get a CSV file of the localities in MO that did not make any tax abatement disclosures in their annual financial reports.
The state does not post local financial audits in an online repository.
|Reporting Jurisdiction||Jurisdiction Type||Gross Revenue Loss|
|St. Louis County||County||$1,732,860|
|Kansas City School District||School district||$26,768,000|
|Kansas City Public Library||Special district||$2,484,819|
|TABULATED LOCALITY AND DISTRICT TOTAL||$150,779,000|